NOT ALL SERVICES DE RENFE AVE-LD operations are profitable, AS REQUIRED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION FROM 2009
Again, BUILDING heard criticism of FTF and has changed its ways. Congratulations on this, because shows the sensitivity of a public body would certainly be difficult to see in our time and our country, to the proposals from citizens and opinion forums. BUILDING
heard criticism from users, some media and FTF (FTF what he called) respect of tariffs for new high speed line Madrid-Valencia-Madrid, unrelated to Prices for other AVE and other modes in the corridor. The company is committed in a statement to restudy the position of their services and pricing, as we explained it, the necessary and essential application of modern techniques in the management of income and prices, as has just released the president of RENFE Operator ( to what Development agrees.)
has also been echoed by WORKS, and we know that the Minister from time to time he wanders through these pages, the request to make public figures in high-speed press release stated that in 2010 had reached the black for the first time for many years ( asked what FTF). It's good to recognize that it is fair and necessary to the taxpayers to know the facts of business that are supported by their taxes, but we still affirm that the proper place for accountability is the company's Web site or blog-more than anything is an instrument of propaganda, and not through Railway Foundation English ( data provided by FFE). On the other hand, should provide adequate detail to enable an examination not only results but also the management of revenue and, above all costs. There is, as replicate some argue that transparency to the accounts of public enterprises favors competition because, first, the transparency of the public is well in excess cualqier another such as the knowledge of your data by competition and, secondly, because, sooner or later, they are published and available, whether private or public companies in the commercial register and the General State Intervention The Court of Auditors, in the case of public schools.
So far, so good. But bearing in mind the following: that 2010 was the deadline that the EU was set to be profitable rail services which may not be considered as public service obligations and be sustainable on their own, without subsidy. It is also necessary to clarify something that was not made explicitly, that accounts made public under the division of AVE + Long Distance, not just the AV services. This means that we are ignoring the accounts of each other and that continues to breach the dela EU Directive to which we referred earlier, and that some - what, how many? - Long distance lines are showing red. Forbidden thing, and that as the online business management unit, each and every one of them must provide and black. Now it MINISTER, say the accounts of each of them, and why not, Suburban, Middle Distance, Merchandise and Integria? Data
reproduced by FFE:
heard criticism from users, some media and FTF (FTF what he called) respect of tariffs for new high speed line Madrid-Valencia-Madrid, unrelated to Prices for other AVE and other modes in the corridor. The company is committed in a statement to restudy the position of their services and pricing, as we explained it, the necessary and essential application of modern techniques in the management of income and prices, as has just released the president of RENFE Operator ( to what Development agrees.)
has also been echoed by WORKS, and we know that the Minister from time to time he wanders through these pages, the request to make public figures in high-speed press release stated that in 2010 had reached the black for the first time for many years ( asked what FTF). It's good to recognize that it is fair and necessary to the taxpayers to know the facts of business that are supported by their taxes, but we still affirm that the proper place for accountability is the company's Web site or blog-more than anything is an instrument of propaganda, and not through Railway Foundation English ( data provided by FFE). On the other hand, should provide adequate detail to enable an examination not only results but also the management of revenue and, above all costs. There is, as replicate some argue that transparency to the accounts of public enterprises favors competition because, first, the transparency of the public is well in excess cualqier another such as the knowledge of your data by competition and, secondly, because, sooner or later, they are published and available, whether private or public companies in the commercial register and the General State Intervention The Court of Auditors, in the case of public schools.
So far, so good. But bearing in mind the following: that 2010 was the deadline that the EU was set to be profitable rail services which may not be considered as public service obligations and be sustainable on their own, without subsidy. It is also necessary to clarify something that was not made explicitly, that accounts made public under the division of AVE + Long Distance, not just the AV services. This means that we are ignoring the accounts of each other and that continues to breach the dela EU Directive to which we referred earlier, and that some - what, how many? - Long distance lines are showing red. Forbidden thing, and that as the online business management unit, each and every one of them must provide and black. Now it MINISTER, say the accounts of each of them, and why not, Suburban, Middle Distance, Merchandise and Integria? Data
reproduced by FFE:
 |
| Click on the chart to enlarge |
 |
| Press on the table for a larger |
0 comments:
Post a Comment